Legal Opinion
Anderson-Prichard Oil Company v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1959No. 38362PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
Mabel Alice Floyd, hereinafter called claimant, widow of William Luther Floyd, hereinafter called employee, obtained an award under the Death Benefit Provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 85 O.S.1951 § 1 et seq. This proceeding is brought by Anderson-Prichard Oil Company, employer, and its insurance carrier, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a corporation, hereinafter called petitioners to review the award.
The record discloses the employee was a driver of a transport truck and trailer engaged in hauling gasoline from Cyril, Oklahoma, to Oklahoma City. He was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Kingfisher v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Special Indemnity Fund v. McFeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- MARBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- TULSA FROZEN FOODS COMPANY v. PendergraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- H. J. Jeffries Truck Line v. GrishamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Bill Morris Tank Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Boardman Company v. EddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Anderson v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Guthrie Ex Rel. Stack v. Modern Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.