Mutual Chemical Co. v. Thurston
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
The sole question on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the findings of the Medical Board for Occupational Diseases (the Medical Board) to the effect that the claimant had sustained a compensable occupational disease—from long exposure to the inhalation of chrome products—which resulted in permanent total disability. The Workmen’s Compensation Commission (the Commission) affirmed the Medical Board, and when the Superior Court of Baltimore City affirmed the Commission, the employer and insurer ap pealed, claiming primarily that the pulmonary dust disease the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Beechwood Coal Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Duncan v. McNitt Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard Inc. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- T. M. Crutcher Dental Depot, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maryland Bureau of Mines v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Babcock & Wilcox, Inc. v. SteinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LeiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Blake v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- City of Frederick v. ShankleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.