Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. The J.M. Smucker Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 22, 2023No. 3:22-cv-06913Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBIN HUMPHREY, Case No. 22-cv-06913-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant The J.M. Smucker Co. (“Smucker”) moves to dismiss a class action complaint 14 brought by plaintiff Robin Humphrey, who alleges that Smucker falsely represented that certain 15 dog and cat food products were healthy for pets when in fact they contain titanium dioxide 16 (“TiO2”) and their packaging contains (or risks containing)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API