Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Haglund

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1928No. 472, 473PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

These two suits in admiralty, which were brought in. the federal court for northern California, arose out of a collision between the ferryboat Thoroughfare and the steamship Enterprise in charge of the tug Relief, in the channel of San Antonio Creek, known as the Oakland Estuary, which resulted in damages to the Thoroughfare and the Enterprise, and the killing of Ernest Haglund, a workman on the Enterprise. In No. 472 the administratrix of Haglund’s estate libelled the Southern-Pacific Co., the owner of the Thoroughfare, and the Rolph Navigation & Coal Co.,-the owner of the Relief, for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. The F. W. Wheeler v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. Atlas Transp. Co. v. Lee Line SteamersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Atlas Transp. Co. v. Lee Line SteamersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Charles Warner Co. v. Independent Pier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Ohio River Company v. Continental Grain CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  3. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. The SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Kenneth L. Hutton, D/B/A Hutton Marine Service v. Walter G. Hougland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Wathen v. WestmoreLand Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API