In Interest of SVG
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.
This appeal follows our recent decision in In Interest of DG, 825 P.2d 369 (Wyo.1992) in again requiring us to address jurisdictional requirements to terminate parental rights to a very young child. The utilization of summary judgment for the parental rights termination action presents an additional issue in this appeal.
We reverse.
I. ISSUES
Stated as issues by appellant are:
I
Whether the order terminating appellant’s parental rights is void because the case was filed by Marianne Lee, Director of DPASS, and not by an attorney authorized to practice law in this state.
II
Whet…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People in Interest of AEColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wlodarczyk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Kenneth T. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Matter of Adoption of CamWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- People in Interest of AEColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.