Legal Opinion
United States v. Reveles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2011No. 10-30313PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GUILFORD, District Judge:
This case concerns whether the Government violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by prosecuting and convicting Robert Reveles for a crime after the Navy punished him for the same offense. The Government argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not implicated because the non-judicial punishment (“NJP”) administered by the Navy under 10 U.S.C. § 815 is not criminal in nature. The Court agrees, and holds that the Government’s prosecution of Reveles was not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. Reveles’ conviction is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Bolton v. Dep't of the Navy Bd. for Corr. of Naval RecordsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Christopher StoltzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023