Legal Opinion

Menton v. Lattimore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1984No. 2-83-220-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON WRIT OF MANDAMUS

JORDAN, Justice.

Relators Paul Edward Menton, D.D.S., Paul Edward Menton, D.D.S., Inc., and Ter*337ri Leigh Crawford seek a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent Judge H.M. Lat-timore to vacate his order compelling production of the tape and transcript of the June 30, 1981 interview of Relators by a representative of the insurance carrier for Relators.

Writ of Mandamus is conditionally granted.

The above-mentioned order compelling production by Relators was issued by Respondent in a wrongful death case involving allegations of dental malpractice. On June 26, 1981, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Crane v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Maresca v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Russell v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc. v. SchattmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Bearden v. Boone, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  5. Superior Trans-Med, Inc. v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API