Legal Opinion

Waters v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1999No. A99A0982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

In this drug forfeiture proceeding under OCGA § 16-13-49, Jamie Waters appeals the trial court’s grant of the State’s motion to dismiss his answer for failure to contain the information required by OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3). In his sole enumeration of error, Waters contends the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to amend his answer. We disagree and affirm.

Waters relies upon the recent Supreme Court of Georgia decision of Rojas v. State of Ga., 269 Ga. 121 (498 SE2d 735) (1998). In Rojas, the Supreme Court held that the provisions of OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3) did not prohibit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rojas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. G. M. J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Carr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dearing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Steven Jerome Howard v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API