Legal Opinion
Dyer v. Thrift
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.
Section 10191, Or. L., provides:
“Every mechanic * * builder, contractor * * and other persons performing labor upon * * any * * ditch * # shall have a lien upon the same for the work or labor done * # at the instance of the owner of the building or other improvement, or his agent; and every * * person having charge of the construction, alteration or repair, in whole or in part of any building or other improvement * * shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purpose of this act.”
Section 10192 extends the lien to the land. Section 10194 provides:
“Every building, or other improvement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Oregon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. NolanOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Allen & Krosel v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Myers v. Strowbridge Estate Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Wertz v. MulloyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zipper v. ZipperOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Gabriel Powder & Supply Co. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Williams v. SharpeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995