Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Thrift

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

Section 10191, Or. L., provides:

“Every mechanic * * builder, contractor * * and other persons performing labor upon * * any * * ditch * # shall have a lien upon the same for the work or labor done * # at the instance of the owner of the building or other improvement, or his agent; and every * * person having charge of the construction, alteration or repair, in whole or in part of any building or other improvement * * shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purpose of this act.”

Section 10192 extends the lien to the land. Section 10194 provides:

“Every building, or other improvement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Oregon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. NolanOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Allen & Krosel v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Myers v. Strowbridge Estate Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wertz v. MulloyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zipper v. ZipperOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Gabriel Powder & Supply Co. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Williams v. SharpeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API