Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sharpe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is a suit to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien. There are no questions of pleading involved; hence we shall proceed with a consideration of the evidence. Between May 8 and November 24, 1923, the plaintiff testified that he expended 360% hours of labor upon the premises in question at the request of one E. L. Sharpe. He asks for compensation at the rate of seventy-five cents per hour, making a total of $270.25. The lower court gave the plaintiff judgment against Sharpe, hut denied him a lien upon the premises. He appeals from that portion of the decree denying him a lien. His…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Title Guarantee Co. v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Fisher v. McPhee & McGinnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Belnap v. CondonUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Pennoyer v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gabriel Powder & Supply Co. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API