Legal Opinion
Longden v. Sunderman
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided November 8, 1988No. Civ. A. Nos. 3-86-1737-H, 3-87-0569-H, 3-87-0572-H, 3-87-0603-H, 3-87-0608-H, 3-87-0609-H and 3-87-0612-HPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SANDERS, Acting Chief Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, filed February 9, 1988; Arthur Andersen & Co., and Alfred C. Hagemann’s (collectively “Andersen”) Response in Opposition, filed July 29, 1988; Plaintiffs’ Reply, filed August 22, 1099; Andersen’s Sur-Reply, filed September 6, 1988; Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief in Response thereto, filed October 20, 1988; Andersen’s Response thereto, filed October 27,1988, together with substantial evidence submitted by both sides (including all private placement memorandums and a list…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Berger v. Compaq Computer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Krogman v. SterrittDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.