Legal Opinion

Albright v. Cortright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1900PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On error to the Sussex Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Adams, J.

The declaration is in tort, and seeks damages from the defendant for breaking and entering the close of the plaintiff, being a tract of land covered with water in Still-water township, in Sussex county, known as Swartswood pond, and for fishing and catching fish therein, in disregard of a notice by the plaintiff not to trespass on his land, and especially not to fish in said pond.

The gist of the defence is found ifi the following extract from the fifth plea, upon which issue has been joined : “That the said Swartswood pond has been stocked…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pearsall v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Conahan v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Herrin v. SutherlandMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kelly v. Rainelle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Conservation v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Jacob Sanchez v. J. T. Taylor, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API