Legal Opinion

Boler v. Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden, and “plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendant [s], as plaintiff’s landlord [s], had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous lead paint condition for a sufficient period of time to have remedied it” (Arnold v Advantage Fed. Credit Union [appeal No. 2], 261 AD2d 939). We reject plaintiff’s contention

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joyner v. DurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. G.M.M. v. KimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  3. Chapman v. SilberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Hamilton v. PicardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Powell v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API