Boler v. Malik
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden, and “plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendant [s], as plaintiff’s landlord [s], had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous lead paint condition for a sufficient period of time to have remedied it” (Arnold v Advantage Fed. Credit Union [appeal No. 2], 261 AD2d 939). We reject plaintiff’s contention
2Cited by8 opinions
- Joyner v. DurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- G.M.M. v. KimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Chapman v. SilberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Hamilton v. PicardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Powell v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.