Legal Opinion

Powell v. Mason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden, and “plaintiff[s] failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendant [s], as plaintiff [s’] landlord [s], had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous lead paint condition for a sufficient period of time to have remedied it” (Arnold v Advantage Fed. Credit Union [appeal No. 2], 261 AD2d 939; see, Boler v Malik, 267 AD2d 998 [decided herewith]). Defendants’ knowledge of the existence of peeling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lanthier v. FeroletoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Boler v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. SilberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Alexander v. Westminster Presbyterian ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API