Legal Opinion

United States v. Kane, Daniel Joseph

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 14, 1981No. 80-1411PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

When a federal officer executes a search warrant of a house, Section 3109 of Title 18 of the Federal Code generally requires that he give “notice of his authority and purpose” and be “refused admittance” before he may “break” into the premises. In this appeal we must determine whether the officer must comply with the announcement requirements of Section 3109 when he reasonably believes that he would be placed in unwarranted physical danger if he made such an announcement. Because we hold, as at least five other circuits have before…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Roger Trent v. Steven WadeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Gene Allen HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Kornegay v. CottinghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Ronald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API