Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1983No. 82-3320PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANDALL, Circuit Judge:

The defendant, Ronald Thompson, appeals his conviction on two grounds: (1) that the district court should have granted his motions to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless search of his residence; and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are vacated and the case remanded for further findings.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

This case began when one Norma Figueredo was arrested for various cocaine-related offenses…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence RoyalstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. CrestaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Walter Richard, Lesburn Lloyd Da Costa, and Headley WeirCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart BaumwaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Mohammad Dawood NusratyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API