Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Bristol Township

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 80-0784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*615MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

In this civil rights action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs seek to recover damages for personal injuries and unnecessary legal costs which they sustained due to alleged police brutality and an unlawful arrest, citation, and detention. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons which follow, I will grant the motion in part without prejudice.

II. Facts

In the early morning of June 25, 1979, plaintiffs were riding in their family automobile in the Red Cedar section of Levittown, Pennsylvania. Amended Complaint, ¶ VI.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Henry Howell v. CataldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Andrew Sims v. C. L. Adams, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Hall v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1983
  2. Silo v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. King v. CuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Uberoi v. University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Uberoi v. University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API