Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Investment Bankers of America, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 25, 1960No. Civ. A. 378-60PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has moved for a preliminary injunc-

tion to restrain the defendant corporation, a registered broker-dealer, from operating its over-the-counter securities business. 1 The motion is based on the S. E. C.’s contention that the defendant has violated Rule 15c3-l (17 C.F.R. 240, 15c3-l), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, by not satisfying the rule’s capital requirement standard. More specifically, the Commission contends that the defendant has allowed its “aggregate indebtedness” to exceed 2,000 per centum of its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Communist Party of United States v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Corning Glass Works v. Lady Cornella Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1969
  3. Estate of Joslyn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Spence v. Balogh & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1962
  5. Luster Enterprises, Inc. v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API