Communist Party of United States v. McGrath
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS and PINE, District Judge.
The preliminary relief sought must be denied since plaintiffs have not exhausted their administrative remedies and for the further reason that the public interest is paramount to any threatened loss or damage to plaintiffs pending final determination of the case. Furthermore, the constitutional questions raised by the plaintiffs can be saved before the Board and determined upon review by the United States Court of Appeals pursuant to the direction of Congress for judicial review of the Board’s actions under the controlling statute.
Counsel will submit for…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- A Quaker Action Group v. Walter J. HickelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Perry v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Industrial Bank of Washington, a Corporation v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and Theodore J. ScheveCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.