Legal Opinion
Randall v. Michelin Tire Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
The parties hereto made a contract whereby the plaintiff was to furnish the defendant with warehouse space for its merchandise and the plaintiff was to ship out such merchandise on defendant’s orders to dealers in the territory. The defendant agreed to pay therefor five per cent of the value of the goods shipped to the dealers, and guaranteed to ship $100,000 worth of merchandise during 1929. The contract also provided that it was “ * * * terminable at the option of either party at any time on written notice.”
The defendant gave written notice of cancellation effective August twelfth, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blake v. . VoigtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Barney v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Marsh v. HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Gallo v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Willis v. RoseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Nemko, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. (In Re Nemko, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994