Legal Opinion

Borg-Warner Corp. v. Board of Finance & Revenue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1967No. Appeals, Nos. 33 and 34PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

The legal issues in these two eases being identical, and the only points of difference being factual, the companion cases captioned Borg-Warner Corporation v. Board of Finance and Revenue, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Textron, Inc. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, were consolidated for argument before this Court.

In both cases, the appellants, Borg-Warner Corp. and Textron, Inc., purchased tracts of realty, and at the time the deeds were recorded, affixed realty transfer stamps. Thereafter, the Dept, of Revenue, ascertaining that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. Sheraton-Midcontinent Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lapp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Broomall Terrace, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. ScheinerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Lapp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. Kaltreider, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API