Legal Opinion

Pitocchelli v. Champy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 21, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForte, J.

This is an action of tort arising out of the allegation the plaintiff was struck by a motor vehicle.

There was evidence tending to prove that the defendant Gradzewicz’s motor vehicle was at the defendant Champy’s Service, Tire & Supply, Inc.’s premises on a lift for service; that the defendant Champy negligently backed the vehicle off the lift and struck the plaintiff, who was lawfully on the premises as a business invitee of the corporate defendant.

It is also reported that “the plaintiffs proven, related medical bills did not exceed five hundred ($500.) dollars.”

There was no evidence that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Murphy v. BohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. NICHOLS & CO. INC. v. Travelers Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Gidwani v. WassermanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STE Financial Corp. v. PopkinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Conti v. Premium II Development Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Sanieoff v. CurtisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API