United States ex rel. Thomas v. Rundle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BODY, District Judge.
The relator, Hezekiah Thomas, has filed with this Court a petition which ambivalently purports to be both a habeas corpus petition and a petition for removal under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443-1446. As a petition for removal, the relator’s action must be dismissed. The proceeding which he seeks to remove from the state court is a state habeas corpus action. Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443-1446 are available to defendants unable to enforce civil rights in a state court, and in a habeas corpus action the relator is no longer a defendant. Nor are there any other federal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States of America Ex Rel. Clarence Hamilton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966