Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Thomas v. Rundle

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1968No. Misc. No. 3721Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BODY, District Judge.

The relator, Hezekiah Thomas, has filed with this Court a petition which ambivalently purports to be both a habeas corpus petition and a petition for removal under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443-1446. As a petition for removal, the relator’s action must be dismissed. The proceeding which he seeks to remove from the state court is a state habeas corpus action. Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443-1446 are available to defendants unable to enforce civil rights in a state court, and in a habeas corpus action the relator is no longer a defendant. Nor are there any other federal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Clarence Hamilton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API