Legal Opinion

United States of America Ex Rel. Clarence Hamilton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 28, 1966No. 15230PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner-appellant, Clarence Hamilton, filed a petition, pro se, in the court below which was docketed and treated by that court as a “Petition for Habeas Corpus”. The petition, however, is entitled a “Petition for the Removal of Cause to the United States District Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania”. In a paragraph of the petition Hamilton prays that the court below “will allow him to submit a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, bypassing the two (2) Appellate State Courts according to Title 28, U.S.C., 2254, and Fay v. Noia, 369 U.S. 869 [82 S.Ct. 1140, 8 L.Ed.2d 274]”.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Hamilton v. MaroneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Hamilton v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John R. Conner v. Joseph F. Salzinger, Sr., Warden, Leroy Zimmerman, District Attorney, Dauphin County, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. United States ex rel. Lyle v. CarneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. United States ex rel. Miller v. RussellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. United States ex rel. Owens v. Quarter Sessions CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. United States ex rel. Thomas v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API