Legal Opinion · Dissent

HINSDALE HOSPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 30, 1995No. 94-3020Published

1DissentCudahy, Circuit Judge

In its progress through the review process this matter has drawn dissent — either formally or in practical effect — at every level. Thus, in the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, Member Sloan dissented on the ground that, when Hinsdale transferred the $5.9 million to Glendale Heights, Glendale Heights was “under Hinsdale’s corporate structure” and “should be treated as if it were a hospital department.” And “all Medicare regulations allow borrowing when it is to benefit a provider department.” This seems to me to put the matter succinctly and accurately.

Later, Magistrate Judge Guzman said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marymount Hospital, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, HhsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. HecklerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. St. Bernard's Hospital, Inc. v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API