Legal Opinion

Ludgin v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1986No. 85-2374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiff sued defendants John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (Hancock) and Otis Elevator Company (Otis) under negligence and re ipsa loquitur theories after she was injured while riding an escalator in the John Hancock building in Chicago. Defendant Hancock filed contribution and breach-of-contract claims against defendant Otis. A jury found against both defendants, allocating 50% fault to each, and awarding plaintiff $18,750. The trial court entered a directed verdict in favor of Otis on Hancock’s counterclaims. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s order entering judgment and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Spidle v. StewardIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McKee v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Chapman v. FoggyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Ryan v. E.A.I. Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Ugaz v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  4. Swaw v. KlompienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Soderquist v. St. Charles Mall Associates, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API