Legal Opinion
YOUNG v. JABIL, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 19, 2025No. 2:23-cv-04992Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MAURICE A. YOUNG, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, N O . 23-4992 v. JABIL, INC. and JABIL BRANDYWINE, INC., Defendants. Baylson, J. Ma y19, 2025 MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS’ DAUBERT MOTION Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Report and Testimony of Dr. John Dieckman (“Daubert Motion”). For the reasons detailed below, the Daubert Motion will be denied. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Maurice Young (“Young”), was employed by Defendant, Jabil, Inc. (“Jabil”) in the role of Machine Operator I…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re: Tmi Litigation Lori Dolan Joseph Gaughan Ronald Ward Estate of Pearl Hickernell Kenneth Putt Estate of Ethelda Hilt Paula Obercash Jolene Peterson Estate of Gary Villella Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7623 in Re: Tmi Litigation All Except Lori Dolan, Joseph Gaughan, Ronald Ward, Estate of Pearl Hickernell, Kenneth Putt, Estate of Ethelda Hilt, Paula Obercash, Jolene Peterson, Estate of Gary Villella and Estate of Leo Beam, No. 96-7624 in Re: Tmi LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.