Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Schlienz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 2009No. A07-874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant Daniel S. Schlienz was charged with criminal sexual conduct, false imprisonment, violation of a harassment/restraining order, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor for his alleged sexual involvement with two 15-year-old girls and one 17-year-old girl. On November 28, 2006, Schlienz entered an Alford plea 1 to two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree related to his involvement with the two 15-year-olds and pleaded guilty to one count each of criminal sexual conduct in the fifth degree, violating a restraining order, and gross misdemeanor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. State v. MuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. BahtuohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API