Legal Opinion
Shedlock v. Department of Correction
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided October 3, 2002No. 983631FPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
The plaintiff, Paul Shedlock (“Shedlock”), has filed this action alleging that, as a prisoner at MCI Norfolk, the defendant Department of Correction (“DOC”) and the individual defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his physical handicap and then retaliated against him for the complaints he made about this discrimination. Both Shedlock and the defendants have moved for summary judgment as to all claims. After hearing and for the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED and Shedlock’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
In evaluating…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abramian v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
- Mustapha v. DaimlerChrysler Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2008