Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Speer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2010No. 2009-0330Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 32} After a thorough review of the record, I conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when during voir dire it declined to remove for cause the *571hearing-impaired juror. Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s decision and would reverse and remand the case to the court of appeals.

I. Trial Court Proceedings

{¶ 33} A jury found Speer guilty of both involuntary manslaughter and aggravated vehicular homicide. On appeal, Speer argued that the trial court erred when it failed to disqualify a hearing-impaired juror for cause. The record discloses how this juror came to be seated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API