State v. Speer
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLanzinger, J.
{¶ 32} After a thorough review of the record, I conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when during voir dire it declined to remove for cause the *571hearing-impaired juror. Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s decision and would reverse and remand the case to the court of appeals.
I. Trial Court Proceedings
{¶ 33} A jury found Speer guilty of both involuntary manslaughter and aggravated vehicular homicide. On appeal, Speer argued that the trial court erred when it failed to disqualify a hearing-impaired juror for cause. The record discloses how this juror came to be seated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.