Legal Opinion

Rikard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1944No. 8 Div. 397PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

Conviction was under Section 131, Title 29, Code of 1940, for the illegal possession of a moonshine still.

The State’s case, under the evidence, was that the defendant and two others, not on trial, were working at the still when the raid was made. The defendant and one Stout were “measuring up the liquor”, siphoning it from a large barrel into smaller kegs, and the third, one Devaney, was removing the worm from the still. When the State’s witness first obtained a view of the scene “they were pulling the fire from under the still.” The still and surrounding premises indicated a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Emerson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Lock v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Emerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Vandiver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Shewbart v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Pryor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API