Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided October 22, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Honorable Brewster,

The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:

If an administrative officer has a conflict of interest in one proceeding before his/her administrative tribunal, would that same officer have a conflict of interest in all proceedings before that administrative tribunal?

To answer your question, we must first examine the particular agency in question to see if that agency has a specific "conflict of interest" statute. Numerous agencies have such statutes, yet each may contain something slightly different than another "conflict of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Anaya v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Hill v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Yetman v. NaumannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API