Legal Opinion
King County v. Viracon Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 4, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00508Unknown
1Opinion
1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 KING COUNTY, Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-508-BJR 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT 10 VIRACON’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 VIRACON, INC., QUANEX IG SYSTEMS, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT INC., and TRUSEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff King County (“King County”) instituted this action against Defendants Viracon, 16 Inc. (“Viracon”), Quanex IG Systems, Inc. (“Quanex IG Systems”), and Truseal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,272, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5268, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8535 in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation. Timothy J. Anderson Neil Singer Arthur Singer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary W. Clow Douglas Whiting Robert Johnson Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated Lawrence FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.