Commonwealth v. Bollinger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
We are concerned with four separate appeals — one by one co-defendant, one by the other co-defendant, and two by the Commonwealth. Each of the co-defendants alleges that he should be discharged on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions, and, in the alternative, that he is entitled to a new trial. The appeals filed by the Commonwealth challenge the refusal of the lower court to order the co-defendants to make restitution, or to tax the costs of prosecution to the co-defendants. The appeals were consolidated, and this opinion disposes of all four…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. DurhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. DietterickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.