Legal Opinion

Derricott v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 1992No. 133, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This case, although involving an initial traffic stop that was concededly valid, ultimately turns on the question of whether the officers who thereafter conducted a limited weapons search of the defendant’s vehicle had a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity, and that the defendant was armed and dangerous. The trial judge and the Court of Special Appeals found that the facts supported those suspicions. We do not.

I

Before trial in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Derricott moved to suppress evidence of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API