Legal Opinion
In Re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 10, 2010No. MDL No. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-cv-10981-PBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Harden Manufacturing Corporation (“Harden”), Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Louisiana (“BCBSLA”), International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 68 Welfare Fund (“Local No. 68”), ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Health Benefits Trust (“ASEA”), Gerald Smith and Lorraine Kopa, collectively the Class Plaintiffs, bring this case against Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- In re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014