In re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This Court has separately issued a Final Order and Judgment approving the class action settlement.
Class Counsel have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(h), 54(d), and 52(a) for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. Having held a hearing on October 22, 2014 and considered all of the submissions and arguments, the Court now ALLOWS the motion with a fee award percentage of 28% of the common fund.
BACKGROUND
This petition for attorneys’ fees arises out of the settlement of a nationwide, decade-long multi-district litigation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- In Re Thirteen Appeals Arising Out of the San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Genworth Financial Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Carlson v. Target Enterprise, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Berns v. Labaton Sucharow LLPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Mongue v. The Wheatleigh CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Mongue v. The Wheatleigh CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024