Legal Opinion

Sandefer & Andress, Inc. v. Pruitt

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1985No. 17057-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORRIS, Judge.

This is a concursus proceeding. At stake is the ownership of minerals that underlie a 60-acre portion of the 260-acre “Scott Tract” in Webster Parish. The trial court found that although the title was burdened of record with a mineral servitude, ten years of nonuse had elapsed, thus unifying the surface and mineral estates. The appellants here are a group of mineral claimants who derive their title from the original servitude owners. Not all the mineral *935claimants have appealed. The appellees are the surface owners, who prevailed at ■trial. For the reasons expressed, we affirm.

Bef…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Union Oil Company of California v. TouchetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Childs v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Spears v. NesbittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Elson v. MathewesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. BarousseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horton v. MobleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API