Legal Opinion

All Aboard Worldwide Couriers, Inc. v. Attorney General

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1998No. 97 CIV. 6973(CBM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion Granting Summary Judgment

MOTLEY, District Judge.

A. Background

This immigration case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Declaratory Judgment Act. Defendants seek summary judgment, arguing that the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s decision to deny a certain kind of work visa to plaintiff and her would-be employer was not an abuse of discretion. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 motion is GRANTED.

Plaintiff Al Aboard Worldwide Couriers. Inc. (“All Aboard”) is a New York corporation. Plaintiff Puja Virk…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Li Cheung v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. London Typographers, Inc. v. SavaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tapis International v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  2. EG Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  3. Residential Finance Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Fast Gear Distributing, Inc. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  5. Xpress Group, Inc. v. CuccinelliDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API