Legal Opinion

Terhune v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 27, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hurt—

Affirming.

Ralph Terhune, a boy about 18 years of age, was indicted for a violation of section 1201c, Kentucky Statutes. Upon a trial the jury found him to be guilty of stealing fowls of less value than two dollars, and therefore he was adjudged guilty of petty larceny. A new *239trial being refused, he has appealed and seeks a reversal of the judgment upon the grounds that the court erred to the prejudice of his substantial rights, (1) in overruling his motion for a directed verdict in his favor and (2) in the admission of incompetent evidence against him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Chaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Black v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Cloninger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Ball v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Madison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API