Terhune v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chiep Justice Hurt—
Affirming.
Ralph Terhune, a boy about 18 years of age, was indicted for a violation of section 1201c, Kentucky Statutes. Upon a trial the jury found him to be guilty of stealing fowls of less value than two dollars, and therefore he was adjudged guilty of petty larceny. A new *239trial being refused, he has appealed and seeks a reversal of the judgment upon the grounds that the court erred to the prejudice of his substantial rights, (1) in overruling his motion for a directed verdict in his favor and (2) in the admission of incompetent evidence against him…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Chaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Black v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Cloninger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Ball v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Madison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943