Legal Opinion
Frengel v. McLaren Automotive, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 7, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00664Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RALPH THOMAS FRENGEL and Case No.: 3:22-cv-0664 W (RBB) RALPH FRENGEL, 12 ORDER GRANTING O’GARA’s Plaintiffs, 13 MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 24] v. AND MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, 14 INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al. 15 25] Defendants. 16 17 Defendant O’Gara Coach Company, LLC dba McClaren Beverly Hills (“O’Gara”) 18 and McLaren Automotive Inc. (“McLaren”) separately move to dismiss the Second 19 Amended Complaint (“SAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)1 and 9(b). 20…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.