Legal Opinion

Curtis C. Flood v. Bowie K. Kuhn

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 7, 1971No. 35424_1PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff and his able counsel have undertaken a comprehensive attack on professional baseball’s “reserve system,” which, pursuant to nationwide agreements among clubs, effectively restricts a baseball player, if he desires to play professional baseball at all, to contract negotiations with that club in organized baseball which first employs or “reserves” him or with that club’s assignee club, and any subsequent assignee clubs, to which in the parlance of the baseball business he has been “sold” or “traded.” After an extensive trial below the complaint was dismissed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kevin Watson and Raymond Wayne Thrash v. Odom Graves, Darryl Jarreau, Marilyn Jarreau, and Abe RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. United States v. AlzankiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API