Legal Opinion

Zurich v. Wehr

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 22, 1947No. 9188PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in the case at bar is directed to alleged errors by the court below in the reception and exclusion of certain evidence. As will be seen from the statement of facts which follows, no small portion of the responsibility for the alleged irregularities can be traced to a lack of artistic presentation by counsel for the litigants. In view of the fact that the -instant case has now *792been tried for the third time,1 we are reluctant to measure with Procrustean standards the discretion exercised by the trial court in the reception and exclusion of that testimony ;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. French v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Friend v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. Zurich v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Allen De GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Diego F. Loinaz v. Eg & G, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. TraftonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API