Legal Opinion

Baker v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 2000No. 99-526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On July 8, 1998, attorney DeeNita Moak was appointed by the chancery court to represent Appellant Nakia Baker in a termination of parental rights case. The order of appointment specifically required Ms. Moak to represent Appellant through all stages of the proceedings, including the appeal. Appellant’s parental rights were ultimately terminated, and that decision was affirmed by this court in Baker v. Ark. Dep’t Human Servs., 340 Ark. 42, 8 S.W.3d 499 (1999). During the pendency of this appeal, Ms. Moak filed a motion for attorney’s fees with the chancery court. The chancery court granted her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Walters v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Ruble v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API