Vianello v. City of Fort Worth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
By our opinion in this case we hold it to be proper to dismiss this appeal on the court’s own motion due to want of jurisdiction and due to lack of record necessary to prevail on appeal.
The trial court dismissed the Vianello suit under Tex.R.Civ.P. 165a, “Dismissal for Want of Prosecution”. Pertinent are the following dates: Order of dismissal: October 7, 1980; Motion to reinstate filed: November 21,1980; Motion to reinstate heard: November 26, 1980; Motion to reinstate denied: December 8, 1980; Appeal bond: November 26, 1980. The appeal bond was filed more than 30 days after the order…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Rizk v. MayadTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. StootTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Allen v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Harris County v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Danforth Memorial Hospital v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Palkovic v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- El Chidiac v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988