Legal Opinion
In Re Ungar
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 30, 2009No. 2009-B-0573PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*102ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.*
| iThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Randy J. Ungar, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
In 1997, Kim Bullock Cutrera and John Meehan retained respondent to represent them in a putative class action against The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (“the Equitable”). This action, known as the Duncan litigation, was pending in Orleans Civil District Court and alleged breach of contract, fraud, and deceptive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- In Re UngarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- In re UngarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016