Legal Opinion
Gillette v. Liberty Nat. Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 1923No. 14302PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error to recover from the defendant in error the sum of $1,875 which it was alleged belonged to plaintiff in error, and which defendant in error had converted to its own use. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. The plaintiff in error and Ira D. Pilcher entered into a contract with S. A. Wilson for the sale of an oil and gas lease, and it was agreed that an assignment of the lease would be deposited in the Liberty National Bank of Tulsa by the parties of the first part, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Arnold v. San Ramon Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Brown v. DaughertyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · 1903
- Two Rivers Dredge & Dock Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- First State Bank v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Brady v. American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Kasparek v. Liberty Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Westerly Community Credit Union v. Industrial National Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Cooper v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.