Legal Opinion
Englehart's Estate v. Larimer
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1936No. 26,809PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTremain, C. J.
— The common council of the city of Hobart, by proper proceedings, ordered the improvement of certain streets in that city pursuant to the Barrett Law, and issued bonds to pay for the improvement against the abutting property of owners who signed waivers as provided in said law (Sections 48-2711, 48-2712, 48-2713, 48-2716, and 48-2718, Burns’ Ann. St. 1933, §§11662, 11663, 11666, 12528, 12529, Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934). Among those who signed waivers was the decedent, Timothy W. Englehart, whose estate is one of the appellants herein.
The total amount of the bond issue, based upon all waivers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tate v. Ohio & Mississippi RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Zuelly v. CasperIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Hall v. EssnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kimes v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Mitsch v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Mitchell v. HartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- Ingram's Estate v. GilmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Keilman, Tr. v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.