Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2003No. 45A03-0212-CR-418PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Bobby Lee Carr, Jr. brings this discretionary interlocutory appeal under Indiana Appellate Rule 14(B) from the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Discharge pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C). Carr presents a single issue for review, namely, *601whether the trial court erred when it denied his motion for discharge.

We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 24, 2001, the State filed a six-count information against Carr, alleging that he had committed various sex offenses against two children. Specifically, Counts I through V alleged that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Donnell v. Cass Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HurstIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Morrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Castle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Carr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Cook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Cook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API