Legal Opinion

Tuma v. American Can Company

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1974No. Civ. A. 1421-70PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACEY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs are females who charge defendant American Can Company (Company) with sex discrimination in employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII), and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (Equal Pay Act). Plaintiffs also charge Local Union 6301 (Union) with violating Title VII and further allege a breach by the Union of its duty of fair representation. 1 Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Bazarte v. United Transportation Union, 429 F.2d 868 (3d Cir. 1970);…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Local 2548, United Textile WorkersDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
  4. Howard v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  5. Secretary of Labor v. Washington HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API