Tuma v. American Can Company
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge:
Plaintiffs are females who charge defendant American Can Company (Company) with sex discrimination in employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII), and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (Equal Pay Act). Plaintiffs also charge Local Union 6301 (Union) with violating Title VII and further allege a breach by the Union of its duty of fair representation. 1 Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Bazarte v. United Transportation Union, 429 F.2d 868 (3d Cir. 1970);…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Local 2548, United Textile WorkersDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
- Howard v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Secretary of Labor v. Washington HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.